LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and RTWO.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while RTWO.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGL.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for RTWO.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGGL.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RTWO.L.

Performance

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGL.L achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than RTWO.L's 15.37% return.

LGGL.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 12.03%
• 10Y*: —

RTWO.L

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: 33.72%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	9.87%	21.17%	19.21%	25.02%	-18.03%	21.94%	16.35%	26.98%	-7.73%
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc	15.37%	11.33%	9.23%	20.06%	-18.68%	19.21%	19.82%	24.50%	-13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGL.L and RTWO.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018	0.81

The correlation between LGGL.L and RTWO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGGL.L	RTWO.L
Technology	28.4%	18.5%
Financial Services	15.9%	15.6%
Industrials	10.9%	17.7%
Communication Services	9.7%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.8%	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.8%
Energy	4.0%	5.9%
Basic Materials	3.2%	4.6%
Utilities	2.5%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	6.1%

Return for Risk

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGL.L

LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RTWO.L

RTWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RTWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RTWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RTWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RTWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGGL.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.98	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.92	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.70	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	12.06	+1.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGL.L and RTWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGGL.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.98	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.33	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.59	+0.23

Drawdowns

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum RTWO.L drawdown of -42.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGL.L and RTWO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGGL.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-42.35%	+8.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-9.08%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.81%	-26.96%	+9.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-29.71%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.70%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-7.89%	+2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.79%	-0.82%

Volatility

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) is 3.55%, while L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that LGGL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGGL.L	RTWO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	5.45%	-1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	12.23%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	16.99%	-5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	21.06%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	21.48%	-4.32%

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RTWO.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGGL.L nor RTWO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGGL.L and RTWO.L in my portfolio?

LGGL.L and RTWO.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGGL.L or RTWO.L?

On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGGL.L or RTWO.L?

LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RTWO.L.

What is the main difference between LGGL.L and RTWO.L?

LGGL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while RTWO.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.30% for RTWO.L.