LGGL.L vs. PACW.L
LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - LGGL.L tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGGL.L returned 26.57% vs 29.76% for PACW.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGGL.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.
Performance
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGL.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGL.L achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.69% return.
LGGL.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PACW.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 9.87% | 15.64% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 11.69% | 16.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGL.L and PACW.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between LGGL.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGL.L
PACW.L
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGL.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.24 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 14.07 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGL.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.51 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.50 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGL.L and PACW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGL.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -16.93% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -9.14% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.70% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.98% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.11% | -0.14% |
Volatility
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 3.36%. This indicates that LGGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGL.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.36% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 9.15% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 11.81% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 15.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 15.35% | +1.81% |
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGL.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison
LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGL.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGGL.L.
LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGL.L and PACW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer