LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds - LGGL.L tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR while PRWU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGGL.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LGGL.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 12.03%
• 10Y*: —

PRWU.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	9.87%	21.17%	19.21%	25.02%	3.01%
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	24.47%	2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGL.L and PRWU.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.73

The correlation between LGGL.L and PRWU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGGL.L	PRWU.L
Technology	28.4%	27.0%
Financial Services	15.9%	15.8%
Industrials	10.9%	9.9%
Communication Services	9.7%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	6.1%
Energy	4.0%	4.0%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.1%

Return for Risk

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGL.L

LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGGL.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGGL.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LGGL.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LGGL.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	—	—

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGGL.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGGL.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGGL.L and PRWU.L in my portfolio?

LGGL.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGGL.L or PRWU.L?

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGGL.L or PRWU.L?

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGGL.L.

What is the main difference between LGGL.L and PRWU.L?

LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.