PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRWU.L vs. LILM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PRWU.LLILM
YTD Return20.49%-93.56%
1Y Return32.19%-91.16%
Sharpe Ratio2.90-0.78
Sortino Ratio4.03-1.52
Omega Ratio1.530.76
Calmar Ratio4.16-0.91
Martin Ratio18.50-2.28
Ulcer Index1.78%39.76%
Daily Std Dev11.32%116.51%
Max Drawdown-16.16%-99.52%
Current Drawdown0.00%-99.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PRWU.L and LILM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PRWU.L achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly higher than LILM's -93.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
54.43%
-96.90%
PRWU.L
LILM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L) and Lilium N.V. (LILM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRWU.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRWU.L, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRWU.L, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PRWU.L, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRWU.L, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PRWU.L, currently valued at 16.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.43
LILM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LILM, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LILM, currently valued at -1.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-1.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LILM, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.74
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LILM, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LILM, currently valued at -2.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-2.27

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the LILM Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRWU.L and LILM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.64
-0.79
PRWU.L
LILM

Dividends

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRWU.L nor LILM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRWU.L drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum LILM drawdown of -99.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWU.L and LILM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-97.59%
PRWU.L
LILM

Volatility

PRWU.L vs. LILM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L) is 3.07%, while Lilium N.V. (LILM) has a volatility of 119.58%. This indicates that PRWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LILM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.07%
119.58%
PRWU.L
LILM