LGDX vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LGDX (Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LGDX returned 21.11% vs 12.84% for BDGS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

LGDX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGDX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.55% return.

LGDX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 7.44%
• 1Y: 21.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: 12.84%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGDX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LGDX Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF	7.92%	15.03%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.55%	9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LGDX and BDGS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025	0.85

The correlation between LGDX and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGDX vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGDX	BDGS
Technology	37.3%	37.4%
Communication Services	11.2%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.9%
Financial Services	10.1%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.5%
Industrials	8.3%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.5%
Utilities	2.8%	1.9%
Energy	2.7%	2.6%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

LGDX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGDX

LGDX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
LGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 70
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGDX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGDX	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.03	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.03	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	3.20	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.15	14.21	-4.05

LGDX vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGDX and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGDX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGDX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGDX and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGDX	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-9.12%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	-4.03%	-4.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-1.84%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-0.66%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	0.91%	+1.17%

Volatility

LGDX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.28%. This indicates that LGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGDX	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	2.28%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	5.16%	+5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	6.38%	+6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	8.23%	+10.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	8.23%	+10.12%

LGDX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGDX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

LGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
LGDX Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGDX and BDGS in my portfolio?

LGDX and BDGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGDX or BDGS?

LGDX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to BDGS (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGDX dropped -15.79% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, LGDX or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, LGDX leads with 21.11% vs 12.84% for BDGS. On fees, LGDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGDX or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, LGDX has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGDX or BDGS?

LGDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGDX or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.48% for LGDX.

What is the main difference between LGDX and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Intech and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LGDX and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.