PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGDX vs. FTAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGDX vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGDX having a 6.86% return and FTAG slightly lower at 6.79%.


LGDX

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
6.86%
6M
5.87%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTAG

1D
-1.13%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.97%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGDX vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LGDX and FTAG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.42

LGDX vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGDX
FTAG

Technology

37.3%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
4.2%

Financial Services

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.8%
7.7%

Industrials

8.3%
24.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
8.5%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Energy

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
55.6%

Technology

LGDX
37.3%
FTAG

-

Communication Services

LGDX
11.2%
FTAG

-

Consumer Cyclical

LGDX
10.3%
FTAG
4.2%

Financial Services

LGDX
10.1%
FTAG

-

Healthcare

LGDX
8.8%
FTAG
7.7%

Industrials

LGDX
8.3%
FTAG
24.0%

Consumer Defensive

LGDX
3.9%
FTAG
8.5%

Real Estate

LGDX
2.9%
FTAG

-

Utilities

LGDX
2.8%
FTAG

-

Energy

LGDX
2.7%
FTAG

-

Basic Materials

LGDX
1.8%
FTAG
55.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGDX vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGDX
LGDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGDX vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGDXFTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.11

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

0.89

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

2.04

+6.90

LGDX vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGDX and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGDX vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGDX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGDX and FTAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGDXFTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-90.89%

+75.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-9.56%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-79.35%

+76.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-71.25%

+69.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

4.15%

-2.06%

Volatility

LGDX vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) at 3.95%. This indicates that LGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGDXFTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.95%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.93%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

14.17%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.41%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

19.60%

-1.25%

LGDX vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGDX vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

LGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than FTAG's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.42%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
LGDX
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF
0.49%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGDX and FTAG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGDX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FTAG (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGDX dropped -15.79% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

On 1-year performance, LGDX leads with 18.68% vs 8.43% for FTAG. On fees, LGDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LGDX has performed better with a 18.68% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.49% for LGDX.

They also come from different issuers: Intech and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LGDX and 0.70% for FTAG.

LGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGDX and FTAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer