LGDX vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGDX (Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Intech, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LGDX returned 23.04% vs 38.68% for BCI. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LGDX vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGDX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.

LGDX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 23.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGDX vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LGDX Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF	9.49%	13.95%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LGDX and BCI is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	-0.04

LGDX vs. BCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGDX	BCI
Technology	33.4%	-
Communication Services	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	-
Financial Services	10.8%	100.0%
Healthcare	9.4%	-
Industrials	7.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

LGDX vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGDX

LGDX Risk / Return Rank: 56
LGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGDX vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGDX	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.30	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.92	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	5.10	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	13.14	-1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGDX vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGDX and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGDX	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.30	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.48	+0.57

Drawdowns

LGDX vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGDX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGDX and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGDX	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-32.69%	+16.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	-7.61%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-4.52%	+3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-12.00%	+9.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.95%	-0.94%

Volatility

LGDX vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) is 2.94%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that LGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGDX	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	5.16%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.61%	14.80%	-5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	16.92%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	16.82%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	15.65%	+2.70%

LGDX vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LGDX and BCI have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGDX vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

LGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than BCI's 13.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
LGDX Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGDX and BCI in my portfolio?

LGDX and BCI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGDX or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to LGDX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGDX dropped -15.79% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, LGDX or BCI?

On 1-year performance, BCI leads with 38.68% vs 23.04% for LGDX. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, LGDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGDX or BCI?

Over the 1-year period, BCI has performed better with a 38.68% return vs 23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGDX or BCI?

LGDX and BCI have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGDX or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.47% for LGDX.

What is the main difference between LGDX and BCI?

LGDX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Intech and Aberdeen.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.