LGCYX vs. VT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LGCYX (Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LGCYX returned 7.23%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for VT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGCYX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

LGCYX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGCYX achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.12% return.

LGCYX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: 5.89%
• YTD: 9.10%
• 1Y: 17.74%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGCYX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGCYX Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund	9.10%	21.73%	17.83%	23.59%	-18.91%	2.29%	23.72%	26.72%	-9.34%	18.55%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.12%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	20.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LGCYX and VT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.96

The correlation between LGCYX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGCYX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGCYX

LGCYX Risk / Return Rank: 32
LGCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LGCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
LGCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LGCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LGCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 63
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGCYX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGCYX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.67	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.33	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	2.35	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	10.04	-3.33

LGCYX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGCYX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGCYX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGCYX drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCYX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGCYX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.30%	-50.27%	+13.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-9.67%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.69%	-16.51%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.30%	-26.38%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.87%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-6.99%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	2.26%	+0.28%

Volatility

LGCYX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund (LGCYX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 4.77%. This indicates that LGCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGCYX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	4.77%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	11.47%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.73%	13.68%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	16.20%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.24%	17.16%	+1.08%

LGCYX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGCYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGCYX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

LGCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGCYX Lord Abbett Global Equity Fund	0.66%	0.72%	0.65%	1.06%	0.96%	1.07%	5.07%	1.34%	5.46%	5.85%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGCYX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, LGCYX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LGCYX or VT?

LGCYX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to VT (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGCYX dropped -36.30% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.