LGCF vs. KWIN
LGCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - LGCF tracks the Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LGCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
LGCF vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGCF achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 2.05% return.
LGCF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.94%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $349.84K | $511.88K | $448.46K | |
| $3.08K | $4.14K | $25.50K |
LGCF vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 9.78% | 4.67% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 2.05% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGCF and KWIN is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGCF vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
LGCF
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LGCF vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGCF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGCF vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCF and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGCF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -1.58% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -0.33% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | — | — |
Volatility
LGCF vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGCF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 4.04% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 4.04% | +10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 4.04% | +10.85% |
LGCF vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGCF vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
LGCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGCF and KWIN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
LGCF has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
LGCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LGCF and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for LGCF and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer