LGCF vs. URAN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LGCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGCF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index, while URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGCF returned 16.43% vs 11.93% for URAN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

LGCF vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGCF achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's -3.44% return.

LGCF

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URAN

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -3.44%
• 6M: -5.94%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGCF vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	4.82%	15.71%	0.57%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-3.44%	49.05%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LGCF and URAN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

LGCF vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGCF

LGCF Risk / Return Rank: 47
LGCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
LGCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
LGCF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LGCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LGCF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 13
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGCF vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGCF	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	0.30	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	0.70	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.08	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	0.39	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	0.85	+7.75

LGCF vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGCF and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGCF vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum URAN drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCF and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGCF	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-31.96%	+15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-31.02%	+25.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-26.70%	+25.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-11.20%	+9.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	14.06%	-12.15%

Volatility

LGCF vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is 3.06%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that LGCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGCF	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	13.40%	-10.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	30.44%	-20.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	39.64%	-26.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.09%	39.40%	-24.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	39.40%	-24.31%

LGCF vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGCF vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

LGCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than URAN's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	1.75%	1.84%	1.19%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.65%	2.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGCF and URAN in my portfolio?

LGCF and URAN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGCF or URAN?

URAN has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to LGCF (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGCF dropped -16.67% vs URAN's -31.96%.

Which ETF is better, LGCF or URAN?

On 1-year performance, LGCF leads with 16.43% vs 11.93% for URAN. On fees, LGCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, LGCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGCF or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, LGCF has performed better with a 16.43% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGCF or URAN?

LGCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for URAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGCF or URAN?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.75% for LGCF.

What is the main difference between LGCF and URAN?

LGCF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while URAN is Uranium. LGCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index, while URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LGCF and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.