PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGAG.L having a 8.78% return and PAXG.L slightly higher at 8.84%.


LGAG.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.27%
YTD
8.78%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*

PAXG.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.45%
YTD
8.84%
6M
5.98%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGAG.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF
8.78%12.56%6.20%-0.81%5.61%4.15%4.80%14.08%-22.77%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
8.84%8.63%1.48%-3.00%-0.45%0.41%0.63%7.84%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LGAG.L and PAXG.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018

0.49

Over the past year, LGAG.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGAG.L
PAXG.L

Financial Services

41.2%
46.1%

Basic Materials

16.4%
14.6%

Industrials

9.2%
8.5%

Real Estate

8.6%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.0%

Healthcare

3.9%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.0%

Energy

3.1%
2.9%

Utilities

2.7%
3.6%

Technology

1.9%
1.1%

Financial Services

LGAG.L
41.2%
PAXG.L
46.1%

Basic Materials

LGAG.L
16.4%
PAXG.L
14.6%

Industrials

LGAG.L
9.2%
PAXG.L
8.5%

Real Estate

LGAG.L
8.6%
PAXG.L
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LGAG.L
6.4%
PAXG.L
6.0%

Healthcare

LGAG.L
3.9%
PAXG.L
3.7%

Communication Services

LGAG.L
3.7%
PAXG.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

LGAG.L
3.1%
PAXG.L
3.0%

Energy

LGAG.L
3.1%
PAXG.L
2.9%

Utilities

LGAG.L
2.7%
PAXG.L
3.6%

Technology

LGAG.L
1.9%
PAXG.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGAG.L
LGAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGAG.LPAXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.83

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

4.61

+2.36

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGAG.L and PAXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGAG.LPAXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.22

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.17

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.35

-0.19

Drawdowns

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGAG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.16%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAG.L and PAXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGAG.LPAXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.16%

-31.27%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.45%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.83%

-21.29%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-21.29%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-3.15%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-6.86%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.97%

-0.50%

Volatility

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that LGAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGAG.LPAXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.60%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.91%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

11.24%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

17.63%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

23.15%

-0.88%

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison

LGAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LGAG.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
0.03%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LGAG.L and PAXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PAXG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGAG.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGAG.L and PAXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer