LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L
LGAG.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Legal & General and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGAG.L returned 5.68%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGAG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.
Performance
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGAG.L having a 8.78% return and PAXG.L slightly higher at 8.84%.
LGAG.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 8.78% | 12.56% | 6.20% | -0.81% | 5.61% | 4.15% | 4.80% | 14.08% | -22.77% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.84% | 8.63% | 1.48% | -3.00% | -0.45% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 7.84% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGAG.L and PAXG.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, LGAG.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Basic Materials
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Industrials
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Real Estate
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Healthcare
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Communication Services
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Defensive
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Energy
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Utilities
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Technology
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGAG.L
PAXG.L
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGAG.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.83 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 4.61 | +2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGAG.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.22 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.17 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.35 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGAG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.16%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAG.L and PAXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGAG.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.16% | -31.27% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -7.45% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.83% | -21.29% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -21.29% | -3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -3.15% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -6.86% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.97% | -0.50% |
Volatility
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that LGAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGAG.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.60% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 8.91% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 11.24% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 17.63% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 23.15% | -0.88% |
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGAG.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison
LGAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LGAG.L and PAXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PAXG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGAG.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.
Find the right allocation for LGAG.L and PAXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer