PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFT vs. NREF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFT vs. NREF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFT achieves a -26.79% return, which is significantly lower than NREF's 13.03% return.


LFT

1D
-2.91%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-27.77%
1Y
-54.81%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-15.79%
10Y*
-3.37%

NREF

1D
1.85%
1M
0.42%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.00%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFT vs. NREF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
-26.79%-39.33%29.40%38.64%-45.07%28.63%14.28%
NREF
NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.
13.03%2.28%13.51%17.36%-8.90%27.81%-3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LFT and NREF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020

0.20

The correlation between LFT and NREF shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (5 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFT:

$52.40M

NREF:

$765.15M

EPS

LFT:

-$0.06

NREF:

$2.26

PS Ratio

LFT:

0.92

NREF:

4.39

PB Ratio

LFT:

0.33

NREF:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFT:

$56.81M

NREF:

$155.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFT:

$63.50M

NREF:

$132.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

LFT:

$37.56M

NREF:

$152.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFT vs. NREF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFT
LFT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NREF
NREF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NREF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NREF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NREF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NREF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NREF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFT vs. NREF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFTNREFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.18

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

1.91

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.57

4.83

-6.40

LFT vs. NREF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFT Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the NREF Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFT and NREF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFT vs. NREF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFT drawdown since its inception was -81.57%, which is greater than NREF's maximum drawdown of -66.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFT and NREF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFTNREFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.57%

-66.09%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.07%

-12.92%

-42.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.51%

-24.00%

-35.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.51%

-44.78%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.22%

-3.98%

-57.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.00%

-16.75%

-16.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.92%

5.10%

+29.82%

Volatility

LFT vs. NREF - Volatility Comparison

Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF) at 6.62%. This indicates that LFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NREF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFTNREFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

6.62%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.38%

17.32%

+16.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.45%

24.64%

+22.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.31%

33.29%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.48%

45.65%

-4.17%

Dividends

LFT vs. NREF - Dividend Comparison

LFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.00%, more than NREF's 13.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
18.00%15.60%15.50%11.16%12.63%9.38%11.16%9.13%9.79%13.75%41.20%24.73%
NREF
NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.
13.45%14.20%12.75%17.40%12.59%9.87%8.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LFT vs. NREF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lument Finance Trust, Inc. and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M202220232024202520260
41.79M
(LFT) Total Revenue
(NREF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LFT and NREF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFT has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to NREF (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFT dropped -81.57% vs NREF's -66.09%.

NREF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFT and NREF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer