LFT vs. CMTG
LFT (Lument Finance Trust, Inc.) and CMTG (Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 3 years, LFT returned -8.68%/yr vs -35.17%/yr for CMTG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFT vs. CMTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFT achieves a -26.79% return, which is significantly lower than CMTG's -10.78% return.
LFT
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 6M
- -27.77%
- 1Y
- -54.81%
- 3Y*
- -8.68%
- 5Y*
- -15.79%
- 10Y*
- -3.37%
CMTG
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 21.33%
- YTD
- -10.78%
- 6M
- -17.52%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- -35.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFT vs. CMTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | -26.79% | -39.33% | 29.40% | 38.64% | -45.07% | -2.26% |
CMTG Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc. | -10.78% | -32.30% | -64.39% | 2.82% | -1.38% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFT and CMTG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LFT and CMTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFT:
-$0.06
CMTG:
-$4.41
LFT:
0.92
CMTG:
0.92
LFT:
$56.81M
CMTG:
$311.27M
LFT:
$63.50M
CMTG:
-$65.16M
LFT:
$37.56M
CMTG:
$51.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFT vs. CMTG — Risk / Return Rank
LFT
CMTG
LFT vs. CMTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc. (CMTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFT | CMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.01 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.32 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | -0.56 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFT vs. CMTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFT drawdown since its inception was -81.57%, smaller than the maximum CMTG drawdown of -87.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFT and CMTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFT | CMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.57% | -87.12% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.07% | -47.34% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.51% | -84.37% | +24.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.22% | -83.09% | +21.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -46.43% | +13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.92% | 26.64% | +8.28% |
Volatility
LFT vs. CMTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) is 13.71%, while Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc. (CMTG) has a volatility of 19.14%. This indicates that LFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFT | CMTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 19.14% | -5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.38% | 44.78% | -11.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.45% | 63.30% | -15.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.31% | 52.57% | -17.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.48% | 52.57% | -11.09% |
Dividends
LFT vs. CMTG - Dividend Comparison
LFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.00%, while CMTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTG Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.27% | 9.10% | 10.06% | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | 18.00% | 15.60% | 15.50% | 11.16% | 12.63% | 9.38% | 11.16% | 9.13% | 9.79% | 13.75% | 41.20% | 24.73% |
Financials
LFT vs. CMTG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lument Finance Trust, Inc. and Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LFT and CMTG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMTG has higher volatility (19.14%) compared to LFT (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFT dropped -81.57% vs CMTG's -87.12%.
CMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFT and CMTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer