LFST vs. CME
LFST (LifeStance Health Group, Inc.) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. LFST operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, LFST returned -3.94%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for CME. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFST vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFST achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than CME's -5.27% return.
LFST
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- -3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CME
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -12.97%
- YTD
- -5.27%
- 6M
- -5.27%
- 1Y
- -7.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.41%
LFST vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 6.53% | -4.48% | -5.87% | 58.50% | -48.11% | -56.53% |
CME CME Group Inc. | -5.27% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFST and CME is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between LFST and CME shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFST:
$2.96B
CME:
$91.76B
LFST:
$0.06
CME:
$11.75
LFST:
126.10
CME:
21.50
LFST:
1.30
CME:
1.88
LFST:
1.96
CME:
13.50
LFST:
2.01
CME:
3.45
LFST:
$1.49B
CME:
$6.76B
LFST:
$323.87M
CME:
$5.84B
LFST:
$83.67M
CME:
$5.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFST vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
LFST
CME
LFST vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFST | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | -0.35 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | -0.34 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.33 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | -1.19 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFST | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | -0.35 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.59 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
LFST vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFST drawdown since its inception was -86.91%, which is greater than CME's maximum drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFST and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFST | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.91% | -77.50% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.30% | -21.42% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.68% | -21.42% | -38.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.09% | -20.76% | -53.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.77% | -20.69% | -52.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 6.03% | +7.08% |
Volatility
LFST vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) has a higher volatility of 25.53% compared to CME Group Inc. (CME) at 9.91%. This indicates that LFST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFST | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.53% | 9.91% | +15.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 16.74% | +16.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.02% | 20.47% | +34.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.44% | 20.03% | +47.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.44% | 23.87% | +43.57% |
Dividends
LFST vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
LFST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.43% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
LFST LifeStance Health Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFST vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFST vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
LFST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 403.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
LFST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.28M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
LFST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.24M and revenue of 403.48M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFST and CME have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFST has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to CME (9.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFST dropped -86.91% vs CME's -77.50%.
LFST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFST and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer