LFSC vs. HTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC).
LFSC and HTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LFSC is an actively managed fund by F/m Investments. It was launched on Oct 30, 2024. HTEC is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2019.
Performance
LFSC vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LFSC vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | -4.62% | 56.54% | -6.02% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -5.59% | 23.91% | 2.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFSC achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -5.59% return.
LFSC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -4.62%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 59.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- -5.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LFSC vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFSC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LFSC vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
LFSC
HTEC
LFSC vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.04 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | 1.60 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 1.42 | +2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | 4.73 | +4.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.04 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.20 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between LFSC and HTEC is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LFSC vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
LFSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 1.04% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
LFSC vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFSC drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFSC and HTEC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.74% | -57.53% | +27.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -16.31% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -35.06% | +23.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -28.86% | +20.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 4.91% | +0.93% |
Volatility
LFSC vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 7.95%. This indicates that LFSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LFSC | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 7.95% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.95% | 14.32% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 23.83% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.27% | 24.29% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.27% | 25.52% | +3.75% |