PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFOD.DE achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly higher than GLUX.DE's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LFOD.DE has underperformed GLUX.DE with an annualized return of 2.55%, while GLUX.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.


LFOD.DE

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
-5.63%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
2.55%

GLUX.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.80%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-6.01%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFOD.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc
-2.18%6.07%-3.94%-1.97%-13.19%23.20%-6.14%23.36%-2.67%12.60%
GLUX.DE
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR
-7.03%2.34%4.43%11.98%-19.34%32.41%23.80%33.53%-9.13%22.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010

0.52

The correlation between LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFOD.DE
LFOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LFOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GLUX.DE
GLUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFOD.DEGLUX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.04

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

0.16

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

0.39

-1.32

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFOD.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

0.13

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.01

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.45

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Drawdowns

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, roughly equal to the maximum GLUX.DE drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFOD.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-43.20%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-16.00%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.51%

-27.94%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-30.52%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-43.20%

+12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.55%

-14.70%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-9.35%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

6.51%

-0.47%

Volatility

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) is 4.46%, while Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that LFOD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFOD.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

5.55%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

15.60%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

19.60%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

21.08%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

20.94%

-6.76%

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFOD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GLUX.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFOD.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LFOD.DE nor GLUX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLUX.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LFOD.DE.

LFOD.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Food & Beverage, while GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LFOD.DE and 0.25% for GLUX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFOD.DE and GLUX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer