PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. SDTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGY vs. SDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than SDTY's 7.95% return.


LFGY

1D
3.97%
1M
-9.03%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
8.72%
1Y
-9.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.96%

SDTY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.07%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.95%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. SDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and SDTY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.67

The correlation between LFGY and SDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFGY vs. SDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LFGY
SDTY

Financial Services

55.3%
11.1%

Technology

34.1%
39.0%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
9.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

LFGY
55.3%
SDTY
11.1%

Technology

LFGY
34.1%
SDTY
39.0%

Communication Services

LFGY
6.7%
SDTY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LFGY
4.0%
SDTY
9.9%

Basic Materials

LFGY

-

SDTY
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

LFGY

-

SDTY
4.5%

Energy

LFGY

-

SDTY
3.1%

Healthcare

LFGY

-

SDTY
8.3%

Industrials

LFGY

-

SDTY
7.8%

Real Estate

LFGY

-

SDTY
1.8%

Utilities

LFGY

-

SDTY
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. SDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. SDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFGYSDTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.24

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

8.97

-9.55

LFGY vs. SDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the SDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and SDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. SDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than SDTY's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and SDTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYSDTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-18.63%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-8.02%

-27.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.95%

-1.25%

-15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-2.89%

-11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.19%

2.00%

+15.19%

Volatility

LFGY vs. SDTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) at 3.00%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGYSDTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

3.00%

+8.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

9.23%

+23.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.55%

11.69%

+27.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.27%

16.51%

+25.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

16.51%

+25.76%

LFGY vs. SDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFGY vs. SDTY - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.09%, more than SDTY's 26.94% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFGY and SDTY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to SDTY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs SDTY's -18.63%.

On 1-year performance, SDTY leads with 17.90% vs -9.94% for LFGY. On fees, SDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDTY has performed better with a 17.90% return vs -9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.09%, compared with 26.94% for SDTY.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 1.01% for SDTY.

SDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGY and SDTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer