LFGY vs. SDTY
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and SDTY (YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned -9.94% vs 17.90% for SDTY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SDTY.
Performance
LFGY vs. SDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than SDTY's 7.95% return.
LFGY
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- -9.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.96%
SDTY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
LFGY vs. SDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 8.72% | -6.97% |
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 7.95% | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and SDTY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.67 |
The correlation between LFGY and SDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
LFGY vs. SDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LFGY
SDTY
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
LFGY
SDTY
Technology
LFGY
SDTY
Communication Services
LFGY
SDTY
Consumer Cyclical
LFGY
SDTY
Basic Materials
LFGY
-
SDTY
Consumer Defensive
LFGY
-
SDTY
Energy
LFGY
-
SDTY
Healthcare
LFGY
-
SDTY
Industrials
LFGY
-
SDTY
Real Estate
LFGY
-
SDTY
Utilities
LFGY
-
SDTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. SDTY — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
SDTY
LFGY vs. SDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFGY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.28 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.24 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 8.97 | -9.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. SDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than SDTY's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and SDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -18.63% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -8.02% | -27.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.95% | -1.25% | -15.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -2.89% | -11.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.19% | 2.00% | +15.19% |
Volatility
LFGY vs. SDTY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) at 3.00%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | SDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.39% | 3.00% | +8.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 9.23% | +23.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.55% | 11.69% | +27.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.27% | 16.51% | +25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.27% | 16.51% | +25.76% |
LFGY vs. SDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFGY vs. SDTY - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.09%, more than SDTY's 26.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.09% | 94.90% |
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 26.94% | 22.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and SDTY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to SDTY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs SDTY's -18.63%.
On 1-year performance, SDTY leads with 17.90% vs -9.94% for LFGY. On fees, SDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDTY has performed better with a 17.90% return vs -9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.09%, compared with 26.94% for SDTY.
Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 1.01% for SDTY.
SDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and SDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer