LFGY vs. ACYS
LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
LFGY vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LFGY
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- -6.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between LFGY and ACYS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFGY vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
LFGY
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LFGY vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFGY | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFGY vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFGY | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.94% | -0.63% | -35.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.72% | -0.44% | -16.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -0.14% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | — | — |
Volatility
LFGY vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFGY | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.93% | 3.47% | +35.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 3.47% | +38.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 3.47% | +38.73% |
LFGY vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFGY vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.45%, more than ACYS's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.45% | 94.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFGY and ACYS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.45%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for LFGY and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer