PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LFEQ vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LFEQ vs. REMX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 8.90%/yr vs -7.48%/yr for REMX. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

LFEQ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's -10.75% return.

LFEQ

1D
0.87%
1M
0.35%
6M
8.40%
YTD
9.84%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
11.53%

REMX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-23.93%
6M
-22.96%
YTD
-10.75%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
-4.84%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
5.76%
ALL TIME*
-5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

LFEQ

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
$53.35K$94.32K$91.22K

REMX

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
$50.08M$56.30M$87.87M

LFEQ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF		9.84%10.49%24.30%19.66%-22.05%27.97%17.56%24.07%-5.55%5.48%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		-10.75%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and REMX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017

0.48

LFEQ vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LFEQ
REMX

Technology

39.1%

-

Financial Services

10.9%

-

Communication Services

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
100.0%

Technology

LFEQ
39.1%
REMX

-

Financial Services

LFEQ
10.9%
REMX

-

Communication Services

LFEQ
10.7%
REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

LFEQ
9.9%
REMX

-

Healthcare

LFEQ
8.3%
REMX

-

Industrials

LFEQ
7.8%
REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

LFEQ
4.5%
REMX

-

Energy

LFEQ
3.1%
REMX

-

Utilities

LFEQ
2.1%
REMX

-

Real Estate

LFEQ
1.8%
REMX

-

Basic Materials

LFEQ
1.7%
REMX
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with LFEQ:
LFEQ vs. VOOLFEQ vs. MSTYLFEQ vs. FVLFEQ vs. SPYLFEQ vs. PTLCLFEQ vs. BDGSLFEQ vs. FTLS
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
LFEQ
LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFEQ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LFEQREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
0.74

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.09
1.29

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.89

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

2.75

+6.34

LFEQ vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and REMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LFEQREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-90.20%

+55.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-41.03%

+32.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-58.11%

+39.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.55%

-73.34%

+47.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-73.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-69.79%

+68.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-66.81%

+60.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

13.28%

-11.17%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 3.57%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LFEQREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

11.77%

-8.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

37.31%

-27.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

49.87%

-37.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

40.57%

-26.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

37.30%

-19.77%

LFEQ vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFEQ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than REMX's 1.97% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF		0.82%0.90%0.74%1.56%1.19%0.37%2.06%1.45%1.07%0.79%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		1.97%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

LFEQ and REMX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to LFEQ (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 5-year performance, LFEQ leads with 8.90% vs -7.48% for REMX. On fees, LFEQ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LFEQ has performed better with a 8.90% return vs -7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LFEQ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.

LFEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.59% for REMX.

LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFEQ and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer