LFEQ vs. FPX
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - LFEQ tracks the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD while FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for FPX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FPX.
Performance
LFEQ vs. FPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than FPX's 18.28% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FPX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
LFEQ vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 10.63% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 27.97% | 17.56% | 24.07% | -5.55% | 5.27% |
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 18.28% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -8.35% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and FPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between LFEQ and FPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
LFEQ vs. FPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LFEQ
FPX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LFEQ
FPX
Financial Services
LFEQ
FPX
Communication Services
LFEQ
FPX
Consumer Cyclical
LFEQ
FPX
Healthcare
LFEQ
FPX
Industrials
LFEQ
FPX
Consumer Defensive
LFEQ
FPX
Energy
LFEQ
FPX
Utilities
LFEQ
FPX
Real Estate
LFEQ
FPX
Basic Materials
LFEQ
FPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
FPX
LFEQ vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.28 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.21 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 10.40 | +3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.71 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.39 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.57 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and FPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -56.29% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -12.28% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -30.88% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -43.14% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.83% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -11.34% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.78% | -1.83% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 2.90%, while First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 6.22% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 17.11% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 23.10% | -11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 26.49% | -12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 24.28% | -6.70% |
LFEQ vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than FPX's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFEQ and FPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to LFEQ (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs FPX's -56.29%.
On 5-year performance, FPX leads with 10.31% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FPX has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.
LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.49% for FPX.
LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.57% for FPX.
LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and FPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer