PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFEQ vs. FPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFEQ vs. FPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than FPX's 18.28% return.


LFEQ

1D
-0.61%
1M
5.08%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.69%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

FPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.02%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEQ vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
10.63%10.49%24.30%19.66%-22.05%27.97%17.56%24.07%-5.55%5.27%
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
18.28%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and FPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017

0.75

The correlation between LFEQ and FPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFEQ vs. FPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LFEQ
FPX

Technology

33.6%
29.8%

Financial Services

12.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

10.5%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.5%
16.1%

Industrials

8.5%
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
2.3%

Energy

4.0%
4.4%

Utilities

2.6%
6.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.3%

Technology

LFEQ
33.6%
FPX
29.8%

Financial Services

LFEQ
12.2%
FPX
3.0%

Communication Services

LFEQ
10.5%
FPX
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LFEQ
10.0%
FPX
3.5%

Healthcare

LFEQ
9.5%
FPX
16.1%

Industrials

LFEQ
8.5%
FPX
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

LFEQ
5.3%
FPX
2.3%

Energy

LFEQ
4.0%
FPX
4.4%

Utilities

LFEQ
2.6%
FPX
6.5%

Real Estate

LFEQ
2.0%
FPX
4.2%

Basic Materials

LFEQ
1.9%
FPX
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEQ
LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEQ vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFEQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.21

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

10.40

+3.69

LFEQ vs. FPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and FPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFEQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.71

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.39

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.57

+0.11

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and FPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFEQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-56.29%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-12.28%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-30.88%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.55%

-43.14%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.83%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-11.34%

+5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.78%

-1.83%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 2.90%, while First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFEQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

6.22%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

17.11%

-8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

23.10%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

26.49%

-12.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

24.28%

-6.70%

LFEQ vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFEQ vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than FPX's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.49%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
0.82%0.90%0.74%1.56%1.19%0.37%2.06%1.45%1.07%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFEQ and FPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to LFEQ (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs FPX's -56.29%.

On 5-year performance, FPX leads with 10.31% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FPX has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.

LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.49% for FPX.

LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.57% for FPX.

LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFEQ and FPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer