LFEQ vs. DAPP
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while DAPP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs -0.16%/yr for DAPP. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DAPP.
Performance
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than DAPP's 33.03% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DAPP
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 33.03%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 55.85%
- 3Y*
- 57.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 10.63% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 16.27% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 33.03% | 15.03% | 44.87% | 285.02% | -85.60% | -38.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and DAPP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between LFEQ and DAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LFEQ
DAPP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LFEQ
DAPP
Financial Services
LFEQ
DAPP
Communication Services
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
LFEQ
DAPP
Healthcare
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Industrials
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Consumer Defensive
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Energy
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Utilities
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Real Estate
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Basic Materials
LFEQ
DAPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
DAPP
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.18 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 1.16 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 2.28 | +11.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 0.91 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | -0.00 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.07 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and DAPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -91.90% | +56.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -48.21% | +39.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -58.88% | +39.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -91.90% | +66.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -27.06% | +26.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -57.42% | +51.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 24.56% | -22.61% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 2.90%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 15.49% | -12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 46.31% | -37.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 61.71% | -49.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 72.90% | -58.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 72.64% | -55.06% |
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFEQ and DAPP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAPP has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to LFEQ (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs DAPP's -91.90%.
On 5-year performance, LFEQ leads with 9.91% vs -0.16% for DAPP. On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LFEQ has performed better with a 9.91% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAPP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.
LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.
LFEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DAPP is Technology Equities. LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.50% for DAPP.
LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and DAPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer