LFEQ vs. ACSI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - LFEQ tracks the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD while ACSI tracks the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for ACSI. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ACSI.

Performance

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than ACSI's 9.66% return.

LFEQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

ACSI

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 5.55%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 18.71%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	10.63%	10.49%	24.30%	19.66%	-22.05%	27.97%	17.56%	24.07%	-5.55%	5.27%
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	9.66%	10.70%	22.51%	21.06%	-20.93%	23.33%	22.93%	24.88%	-4.97%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and ACSI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017	0.81

The correlation between LFEQ and ACSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFEQ	ACSI
Technology	33.6%	12.5%
Financial Services	12.2%	9.6%
Communication Services	10.5%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	24.2%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.5%
Industrials	8.5%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	12.4%
Energy	4.0%	3.4%
Utilities	2.6%	3.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEQ

LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 48
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFEQ	ACSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.63	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.31	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.42	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.08	9.45	+4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and ACSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFEQ	ACSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.63	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.55	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.75	-0.08

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and ACSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFEQ	ACSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-34.49%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-7.76%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-15.27%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.55%	-24.86%	-0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-2.38%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-5.39%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.98%	-0.03%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 2.90%, while American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFEQ	ACSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	4.16%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	8.88%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	11.56%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	16.66%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.43%	+0.15%

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFEQ vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ACSI's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.83%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	0.82%	0.90%	0.74%	1.56%	1.19%	0.37%	2.06%	1.45%	1.07%	0.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFEQ and ACSI in my portfolio?

LFEQ and ACSI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFEQ or ACSI?

ACSI has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to LFEQ (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs ACSI's -34.49%.

Which ETF is better, LFEQ or ACSI?

On 5-year performance, LFEQ leads with 9.91% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, LFEQ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFEQ or ACSI?

Over the 5-year period, LFEQ has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFEQ or ACSI?

LFEQ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFEQ or ACSI?

LFEQ and ACSI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.82%.

What is the main difference between LFEQ and ACSI?

LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.66% for ACSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.