LEU vs. PM
LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. LEU operates in Uranium (Energy), while PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEU returned 47.91%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for PM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEU vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -32.49% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed PM with an annualized return of 47.91%, while PM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.
LEU
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -44.67%
- YTD
- -32.49%
- 1Y
- -32.37%
- 3Y*
- 67.27%
- 5Y*
- 47.04%
- 10Y*
- 47.91%
- ALL TIME*
- -8.80%
PM
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- YTD
- 22.40%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.19%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $156.44M | $139.30M | $160.04M | |
| $1.01B | $973.71M | $905.87M |
LEU vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | -32.49% | 264.45% | 22.42% | 67.52% | -34.92% | 115.78% | 236.19% | 307.10% | -57.86% | -37.15% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 22.40% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEU and PM is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.10 |
The correlation between LEU and PM shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEU:
$3.11B
PM:
$300.80B
LEU:
$2.77
PM:
$6.97
LEU:
59.18
PM:
27.70
LEU:
7.93
PM:
7.08
LEU:
$452.30M
PM:
$42.55B
LEU:
$116.10M
PM:
$28.72B
LEU:
$70.50M
PM:
$18.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEU vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
LEU
PM
LEU vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEU | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.31 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 2.88 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEU vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEU | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -42.87% | -57.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.37% | -18.54% | -47.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.37% | -20.64% | -45.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.23% | -22.78% | -55.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.84% | -42.87% | -40.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.58% | -0.67% | -96.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.07% | -9.98% | -64.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.56% | 8.42% | +35.14% |
Volatility
LEU vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 20.92% compared to Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) at 9.51%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEU | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.92% | 9.51% | +11.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.35% | 22.25% | +42.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.29% | 27.90% | +63.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.96% | 23.12% | +63.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.49% | 24.62% | +57.87% |
Dividends
LEU vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.05% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
LEU vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEU vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
LEU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.66B and revenue of 11.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
LEU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 4.53B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.5%.
LEU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEU and PM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEU has higher volatility (20.92%) compared to PM (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs PM's -42.87%.
PM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEU and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer