LEU vs. K.TO
LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) and K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. LEU operates in Uranium (Energy), while K.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, LEU returned 47.52%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for K.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEU vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LEU is traded in USD, while K.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the K.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -33.03% return, which is significantly lower than K.TO's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 47.52%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.69% annualized return.
LEU
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- -33.03%
- 6M
- -34.71%
- 1Y
- 0.21%
- 3Y*
- 68.75%
- 5Y*
- 43.53%
- 10Y*
- 47.52%
K.TO
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- -9.10%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 63.05%
- 3Y*
- 76.47%
- 5Y*
- 28.81%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
LEU vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | -33.03% | 264.45% | 22.42% | 67.52% | -34.92% | 115.78% | 236.19% | 307.10% | -57.86% | -37.15% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -9.10% | 205.76% | 55.88% | 52.77% | -27.35% | -20.20% | 56.50% | 46.02% | -25.12% | 38.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEU and K.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LEU and K.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEU:
$3.65B
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
LEU:
$2.89
K.TO:
$2.36
LEU:
56.19
K.TO:
10.83
LEU:
7.53
K.TO:
3.90
LEU:
4.71
K.TO:
3.39
LEU:
$452.30M
K.TO:
$7.97B
LEU:
$116.10M
K.TO:
$4.26B
LEU:
$70.50M
K.TO:
$5.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEU vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LEU
K.TO
LEU vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEU | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.77 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 5.33 | -5.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEU vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than K.TO's maximum drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and K.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEU | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -94.64% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.37% | -37.51% | -28.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.37% | -37.51% | -28.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.23% | -56.25% | -21.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.84% | -68.23% | -15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.60% | -32.36% | -65.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.98% | -61.04% | -12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.60% | 12.45% | +26.15% |
Volatility
LEU vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 24.20% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) at 18.27%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEU | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.20% | 18.27% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.53% | 39.44% | +27.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.26% | 51.25% | +40.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.35% | 42.93% | +43.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.30% | 45.97% | +36.33% |
Dividends
LEU vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% |
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LEU vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEU vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison
LEU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
LEU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
LEU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEU and K.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LEU and K.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer