LEQIX vs. NLSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEQIX (LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, LEQIX returned 5.20%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for NLSIX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEQIX charges 1.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.

Performance

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund (LEQIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEQIX achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LEQIX has underperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.86% annualized return.

LEQIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 5.09%
• 1Y: 13.58%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

NLSIX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEQIX LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund	6.40%	2.88%	11.56%	3.43%	-8.80%	14.59%	4.03%	13.68%	-12.53%	2.58%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	2.34%	7.20%	7.47%	13.10%	-6.85%	9.01%	15.27%	17.11%	-6.92%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LEQIX and NLSIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between LEQIX and NLSIX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LEQIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEQIX

LEQIX Risk / Return Rank: 40
LEQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
LEQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LEQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LEQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LEQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund (LEQIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEQIX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.26	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.86	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	1.41	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.23	5.44	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEQIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEQIX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEQIX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.26	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.86	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.94	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.96	-0.69

Drawdowns

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEQIX drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEQIX and NLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEQIX	NLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-14.75%	-17.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.55%	-4.39%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.68%	-6.90%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.78%	-10.79%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.49%	-14.75%	-17.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.58%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-2.02%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	1.13%	+0.63%

Volatility

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund (LEQIX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that LEQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEQIX	NLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	1.42%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.47%	3.93%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.14%	4.91%	+4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.95%	6.66%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.16%	7.32%	+4.84%

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEQIX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEQIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

LEQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.05%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEQIX LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund	19.05%	20.27%	1.22%	1.50%	1.31%	6.09%	0.00%	0.33%	3.86%	4.40%	0.00%	0.00%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEQIX and NLSIX in my portfolio?

LEQIX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEQIX or NLSIX?

LEQIX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEQIX dropped -32.49% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.