LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD
LEO-USD (UNUS SED LEO) and DOT-USD (Polkadot) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 5 years, LEO-USD returned 26.77%/yr vs -42.78%/yr for DOT-USD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEO-USD achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly higher than DOT-USD's -52.60% return.
LEO-USD
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.77%
- 10Y*
- —
DOT-USD
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- 6M
- -59.04%
- YTD
- -52.60%
- 1Y
- -78.24%
- 3Y*
- -46.24%
- 5Y*
- -42.78%
- 10Y*
- —
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO-USD UNUS SED LEO | -0.95% | 6.43% | 128.19% | 10.13% | -4.23% | 31.93% |
DOT-USD Polkadot | -52.60% | -73.03% | -22.95% | 96.80% | -84.73% | 19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEO-USD and DOT-USD is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD — Risk / Return Rank
LEO-USD
DOT-USD
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.81 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.95 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | -1.39 | +2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -58.67%, smaller than the maximum DOT-USD drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO-USD and DOT-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -98.50% | +39.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.62% | -82.23% | +50.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -93.00% | +61.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.67% | -98.50% | +42.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.91% | -98.43% | +90.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -81.34% | +53.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 54.29% | -45.67% |
Volatility
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) is 5.63%, while Polkadot (DOT-USD) has a volatility of 13.65%. This indicates that LEO-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOT-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 13.65% | -8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.54% | 55.69% | -19.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.20% | 70.41% | -28.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.87% | 71.79% | -26.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.28% | 72.38% | -26.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEO-USD and DOT-USD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOT-USD has higher volatility (13.65%) compared to LEO-USD (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEO-USD dropped -58.67% vs DOT-USD's -98.50%.
LEO-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEO-USD and DOT-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer