LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD
LEO-USD (UNUS SED LEO) and DOT-USD (Polkadot) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 5 years, LEO-USD returned 25.94%/yr vs -46.20%/yr for DOT-USD. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEO-USD achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than DOT-USD's -56.02% return.
LEO-USD
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 8.56%
- 3Y*
- 35.09%
- 5Y*
- 25.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.30%
DOT-USD
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -49.16%
- YTD
- -56.02%
- 1Y
- -77.83%
- 3Y*
- -45.96%
- 5Y*
- -46.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -48.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DOT-USD Polkadot | $59.06M | $65.75M | $126.85M |
LEO-USD UNUS SED LEO | $3.11M | $3.77M | $7.01M |
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO-USD UNUS SED LEO | 1.29% | 6.43% | 128.19% | 10.13% | -4.23% | 31.93% |
DOT-USD Polkadot | -56.02% | -73.03% | -22.95% | 96.80% | -84.73% | 19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEO-USD and DOT-USD is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD — Risk / Return Rank
LEO-USD
DOT-USD
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.81 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.93 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | -1.32 | +2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -58.67%, smaller than the maximum DOT-USD drawdown of -98.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO-USD and DOT-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -98.59% | +39.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.62% | -83.28% | +51.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -93.44% | +61.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.67% | -98.59% | +42.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.83% | -98.54% | +92.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.51% | -81.53% | +54.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 44.13% | -35.41% |
Volatility
LEO-USD vs. DOT-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) is 3.29%, while Polkadot (DOT-USD) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that LEO-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOT-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEO-USD | DOT-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 14.62% | -11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.63% | 53.10% | -17.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.19% | 69.85% | -27.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.80% | 71.29% | -27.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 72.10% | -25.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEO-USD and DOT-USD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOT-USD has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to LEO-USD (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEO-USD dropped -58.67% vs DOT-USD's -98.59%.
LEO-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEO-USD and DOT-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer