LEO-USD vs. SCHG
LEO-USD (UNUS SED LEO) is a cryptocurrency, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, LEO-USD returned 26.77%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEO-USD vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEO-USD achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.46% return.
LEO-USD
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
LEO-USD vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEO-USD UNUS SED LEO | -0.95% | 6.43% | 128.19% | 10.13% | -4.23% | 177.40% | 66.40% | -22.41% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.46% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEO-USD and SCHG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEO-USD vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
LEO-USD
SCHG
LEO-USD vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEO-USD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.12 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 3.58 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEO-USD vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -58.67%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEO-USD and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEO-USD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -34.59% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.62% | -16.41% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -23.39% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.67% | -34.59% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.91% | -1.74% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -5.20% | -22.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 5.11% | +3.51% |
Volatility
LEO-USD vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
UNUS SED LEO (LEO-USD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEO-USD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.54% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.54% | 12.74% | +23.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.20% | 16.27% | +25.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.87% | 22.40% | +22.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.28% | 21.56% | +24.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEO-USD and SCHG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEO-USD has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to SCHG (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEO-USD dropped -58.67% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEO-USD and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer