PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LENIX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LENIX achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.84% return.


LENIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.14%
YTD
6.49%
6M
6.19%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.78%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LENIX
BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund
6.49%14.08%3.04%14.66%-16.44%11.94%9.14%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.84%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LENIX and JRLVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020

0.97

The correlation between LENIX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LENIX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LENIX
LENIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LENIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LENIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LENIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LENIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LENIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LENIXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.19

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

13.84

-1.52

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LENIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LENIX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LENIX drawdown since its inception was -22.77%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LENIX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LENIXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.77%

-32.53%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-8.50%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-15.27%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

-25.64%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.43%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.54%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.96%

-0.63%

Volatility

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) is 2.98%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that LENIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LENIXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

4.71%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

9.85%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

11.98%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.42%

14.88%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.30%

16.03%

-5.73%

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LENIX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LENIX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

LENIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
LENIX
BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund
2.08%2.21%0.00%2.39%2.24%2.19%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LENIX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to LENIX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LENIX dropped -22.77% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LENIX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer