LENIX vs. PADLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LENIX (BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund) and PADLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LENIX returned 4.74%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for PADLX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LENIX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for PADLX.

Performance

LENIX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LENIX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.88% return.

LENIX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 17.12%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 4.74%
• 10Y*: —

PADLX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.98%
• 3Y*: 10.43%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LENIX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LENIX BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund	6.89%	14.08%	3.04%	14.66%	-16.44%	11.94%	9.14%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.88%	10.83%	8.34%	11.01%	-12.54%	2.93%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LENIX and PADLX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020	0.91

The correlation between LENIX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LENIX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LENIX

LENIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LENIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
LENIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LENIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LENIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LENIX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

PADLX

PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LENIX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LENIX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	3.14	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	4.67	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.63	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.92	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	17.17	-3.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LENIX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LENIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LENIX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LENIX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	3.14	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.62	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.65	+0.02

Drawdowns

LENIX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LENIX drawdown since its inception was -22.77%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LENIX and PADLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LENIX	PADLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.77%	-18.87%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.80%	-3.63%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.69%	-6.63%	-7.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.77%	-18.87%	-3.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.59%	-4.83%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	0.83%	+0.48%

Volatility

LENIX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund (LENIX) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that LENIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LENIX	PADLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	1.57%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.91%	3.62%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	4.54%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	6.65%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.29%	7.51%	+2.78%

LENIX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LENIX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LENIX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

LENIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than PADLX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LENIX BlackRock LifePath ESG Index 2030 Fund	2.07%	2.21%	0.00%	2.39%	2.24%	2.19%	0.67%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.94%	5.03%	3.71%	2.91%	1.01%	1.45%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LENIX and PADLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LENIX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LENIX or PADLX?

LENIX has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LENIX dropped -22.77% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.