LEN vs. VRSN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LEN (Lennar Corporation) and VRSN (VeriSign, Inc.) are both stocks. LEN operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while VRSN operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LEN returned 8.57%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for VRSN. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEN vs. VRSN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than VRSN's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed VRSN with an annualized return of 8.57%, while VRSN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.

LEN

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -14.11%
• 6M: -17.47%
• 1Y: -16.31%
• 3Y*: -8.22%
• 5Y*: 0.11%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

VRSN

• 1D: -6.40%
• 1M: -20.10%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: -10.67%
• 3Y*: 4.34%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEN vs. VRSN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEN Lennar Corporation	-14.11%	-20.80%	-7.32%	66.92%	-20.64%	53.99%	37.97%	42.96%	-37.91%	50.28%
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	2.60%	18.41%	0.49%	0.25%	-19.06%	17.29%	12.31%	29.93%	29.58%	50.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LEN and VRSN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 1998	0.29

The correlation between LEN and VRSN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LEN : $21.21B VRSN : $22.74B
EPS LEN : $7.91 VRSN : $9.04
PE Ratio LEN : 11.06 VRSN : 27.39
PS Ratio LEN : 0.66 VRSN : 13.69
Total Revenue (TTM) LEN : $32.74B VRSN : $1.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) LEN : $1.72B VRSN : $1.49B
EBITDA (TTM) LEN : $2.36B VRSN : $1.18B

Return for Risk

LEN vs. VRSN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN

LEN Risk / Return Rank: 25
LEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
LEN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LEN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

VRSN

VRSN Risk / Return Rank: 26
VRSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VRSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
VRSN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
VRSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VRSN Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEN vs. VRSN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEN	VRSN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.37	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	-0.32	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.96	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	-0.35	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	-0.70	-0.02

LEN vs. VRSN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is comparable to the VRSN Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and VRSN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEN vs. VRSN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, roughly equal to the maximum VRSN drawdown of -98.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and VRSN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEN	VRSN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.28%	-98.37%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.39%	-30.21%	-11.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.51%	-30.21%	-24.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.51%	-38.85%	-15.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.80%	-38.85%	-19.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.66%	-20.10%	-31.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.31%	-56.94%	+30.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.73%	15.33%	+7.40%

Volatility

LEN vs. VRSN - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) have volatilities of 11.44% and 11.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEN	VRSN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.44%	11.06%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.14%	22.34%	+4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.85%	28.95%	+8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.65%	25.37%	+9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.37%	26.36%	+11.01%

Dividends

LEN vs. VRSN - Dividend Comparison

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than VRSN's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEN Lennar Corporation	2.29%	1.95%	1.47%	1.01%	1.66%	0.86%	0.82%	0.29%	0.41%	0.25%	0.37%	0.33%
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	1.28%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LEN vs. VRSN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and VeriSign, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of -390.70M and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.9%.

VRSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 379.70M and revenue of 428.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.5%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 629.34M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

VRSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported an operating income of 293.60M and revenue of 428.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.5%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 656.43M and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

VRSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a net income of 214.50M and revenue of 428.90M, resulting in a net margin of 50.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEN and VRSN in my portfolio?

LEN and VRSN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEN or VRSN?

LEN has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to VRSN (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEN dropped -94.28% vs VRSN's -98.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.