PortfoliosLab logo
LEN vs. TXRH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LEN and TXRH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LEN vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEN:

-0.91

TXRH:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

LEN:

-1.13

TXRH:

1.09

Omega Ratio

LEN:

0.87

TXRH:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

LEN:

-0.62

TXRH:

0.67

Martin Ratio

LEN:

-1.18

TXRH:

1.68

Ulcer Index

LEN:

23.56%

TXRH:

9.87%

Daily Std Dev

LEN:

32.39%

TXRH:

27.65%

Max Drawdown

LEN:

-94.28%

TXRH:

-76.59%

Current Drawdown

LEN:

-39.29%

TXRH:

-5.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEN:

$29.39B

TXRH:

$12.80B

EPS

LEN:

$13.70

TXRH:

$6.60

PE Ratio

LEN:

8.17

TXRH:

29.23

PEG Ratio

LEN:

1.51

TXRH:

2.31

PS Ratio

LEN:

0.82

TXRH:

2.33

PB Ratio

LEN:

1.28

TXRH:

9.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEN:

$35.76B

TXRH:

$5.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEN:

$5.28B

TXRH:

$909.53M

EBITDA (TTM)

LEN:

$4.73B

TXRH:

$712.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -14.56% return, which is significantly lower than TXRH's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 10.18%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively higher 20.50% annualized return.


LEN

YTD

-14.56%

1M

7.31%

6M

-30.99%

1Y

-29.32%

5Y*

16.98%

10Y*

10.18%

TXRH

YTD

7.35%

1M

19.17%

6M

-1.86%

1Y

15.37%

5Y*

33.86%

10Y*

20.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEN vs. TXRH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEN is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEN is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TXRH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TXRH is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TXRH is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TXRH is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TXRH is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TXRH is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TXRH is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEN vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and TXRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LEN vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than TXRH's 1.30% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEN
Lennar Corporation
1.75%1.46%1.00%1.65%0.85%0.81%0.28%0.41%0.25%0.37%0.32%0.35%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.30%1.35%1.80%2.02%1.34%0.46%2.13%1.68%1.59%1.58%1.90%1.78%

Drawdowns

LEN vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than TXRH's maximum drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and TXRH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LEN vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) at 8.19%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LEN vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
7.63B
1.45B
(LEN) Total Revenue
(TXRH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEN vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
11.3%
13.7%
(LEN) Gross Margin
(TXRH) Gross Margin
LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of 861.05M and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.

TXRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 197.79M and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.7%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 713.67M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

TXRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.57M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 519.53M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

TXRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 113.66M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.