LEN vs. TXRH

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -17.79% return, which is significantly lower than TXRH's -10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 10.28%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and TXRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than TXRH's 1.55% yield.

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than TXRH's maximum drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and TXRH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) at 12.12%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.