PortfoliosLab logo
LEN vs. NVR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LEN and NVR is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LEN vs. NVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEN:

-0.91

NVR:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

LEN:

-1.13

NVR:

0.05

Omega Ratio

LEN:

0.87

NVR:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

LEN:

-0.62

NVR:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

LEN:

-1.18

NVR:

-0.15

Ulcer Index

LEN:

23.56%

NVR:

16.20%

Daily Std Dev

LEN:

32.39%

NVR:

25.92%

Max Drawdown

LEN:

-94.28%

NVR:

-97.91%

Current Drawdown

LEN:

-39.29%

NVR:

-25.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEN:

$29.39B

NVR:

$21.55B

EPS

LEN:

$13.70

NVR:

$493.08

PE Ratio

LEN:

8.17

NVR:

14.95

PEG Ratio

LEN:

1.51

NVR:

4.89

PS Ratio

LEN:

0.82

NVR:

2.01

PB Ratio

LEN:

1.28

NVR:

5.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEN:

$35.76B

NVR:

$10.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEN:

$5.28B

NVR:

$2.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEN:

$4.73B

NVR:

$2.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a -14.56% return, which is significantly lower than NVR's -9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed NVR with an annualized return of 10.18%, while NVR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.


LEN

YTD

-14.56%

1M

7.31%

6M

-30.99%

1Y

-29.32%

5Y*

16.98%

10Y*

10.18%

NVR

YTD

-9.89%

1M

2.51%

6M

-18.34%

1Y

-3.89%

5Y*

18.97%

10Y*

18.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEN vs. NVR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEN is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEN is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEN is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEN is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NVR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVR is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVR is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVR is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVR is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVR is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVR is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEN vs. NVR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the NVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and NVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LEN vs. NVR - Dividend Comparison

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEN
Lennar Corporation
1.75%1.46%1.00%1.65%0.85%0.81%0.28%0.41%0.25%0.37%0.32%0.35%
NVR
NVR, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LEN vs. NVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, roughly equal to the maximum NVR drawdown of -97.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and NVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LEN vs. NVR - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to NVR, Inc. (NVR) at 7.10%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LEN vs. NVR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and NVR, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
7.63B
2.35B
(LEN) Total Revenue
(NVR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEN vs. NVR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennar Corporation and NVR, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
11.3%
21.9%
(LEN) Gross Margin
(NVR) Gross Margin
LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of 861.05M and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.

NVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 515.07M and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 713.67M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

NVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 376.67M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 519.53M and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

NVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 299.58M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.