LEN vs. NVR

In the year-to-date period, LEN achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than NVR's 28.67% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN has underperformed NVR with an annualized return of 14.82%, while NVR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the NVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN and NVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LEN drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, roughly equal to the maximum NVR drawdown of -97.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN and NVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to NVR, Inc. (NVR) at 5.68%. This indicates that LEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennar Corporation and NVR, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.