PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEN-B vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEN-B vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEN-B achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LEN-B has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.19%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


LEN-B

1D
-1.81%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-6.99%
6M
-29.49%
1Y
-12.47%
3Y*
-0.81%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
11.19%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEN-B vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEN-B
Lennar Corporation
-6.99%-22.92%-0.04%82.02%-20.04%58.29%38.63%43.24%-39.16%53.36%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LEN-B and VOO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between LEN-B and VOO has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEN-B vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEN-B
LEN-B Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LEN-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEN-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEN-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LEN-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEN-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEN-B vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEN-BVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.43

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

3.16

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

14.73

-15.30

LEN-B vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEN-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEN-B and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEN-BVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

2.39

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.83

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.87

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.89

-0.75

Drawdowns

LEN-B vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEN-B drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEN-B and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEN-BVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-33.99%

-61.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.29%

-8.90%

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.66%

-18.69%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.66%

-24.52%

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.05%

-33.99%

-28.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.20%

-0.70%

-45.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-3.69%

-31.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.90%

1.91%

+19.99%

Volatility

LEN-B vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lennar Corporation (LEN-B) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that LEN-B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEN-BVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

2.84%

+7.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.01%

8.90%

+17.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.84%

11.80%

+26.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.62%

16.81%

+17.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.90%

18.01%

+19.89%

Dividends

LEN-B vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LEN-B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEN-B
Lennar Corporation
2.28%2.10%1.51%1.12%2.01%1.05%1.02%0.36%0.51%0.30%0.46%0.40%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEN-B and VOO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEN-B has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEN-B dropped -95.76% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEN-B and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer