PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LEMB vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LEMB vs. VEU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) and VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor, while VEU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEMB returned 1.37%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for VEU. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEMB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VEU.

Performance

LEMB vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB has underperformed VEU with an annualized return of 1.37%, while VEU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.

LEMB

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.19%
6M
2.18%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
1.37%

VEU

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.07%
YTD
14.60%
6M
17.34%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEMB vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF		1.19%18.02%-1.72%7.23%-10.74%-9.92%3.10%6.40%-7.49%12.49%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF		14.60%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LEMB and VEU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.60

The correlation between LEMB and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF

Often compared with LEMB:
LEMB vs. EMLCLEMB vs. EMBLEMB vs. EBNDLEMB vs. VWOBLEMB vs. PFUIXLEMB vs. PELBXLEMB vs. FLOT
Often compared with VEU:
VEU vs. VXUSVEU vs. VEAVEU vs. VOOVEU vs. VGKVEU vs. SPYVEU vs. ACWXVEU vs. VTI

Return for Risk

LEMB vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LEMB
LEMB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEMB vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LEMBVEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
2.13

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.10
2.94

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.85

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

11.06

-5.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEMB vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LEMBVEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.13

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.54

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.58

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.25

-0.21

Drawdowns

LEMB vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB and VEU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LEMBVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-61.52%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-11.43%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

-13.69%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-29.31%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

-34.98%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-0.98%

-3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-13.13%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.93%

-1.17%

Volatility

LEMB vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) is 2.09%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that LEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LEMBVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

5.59%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

13.04%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54%

15.29%

-8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

16.07%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

17.21%

-7.92%

LEMB vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEMB vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

LEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than VEU's 2.61% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF		2.41%2.44%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.64%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF		2.61%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

LEMB and VEU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to LEMB (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEMB dropped -30.82% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 9.94% vs 1.37% for LEMB. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, LEMB has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 1.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LEMB.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.41% for LEMB.

LEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VEU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. LEMB tracks J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB and 0.04% for VEU.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEMB and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer