PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LEMB vs. EBND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LEMBEBND
YTD Return-0.82%-2.04%
1Y Return2.94%2.84%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.52%-2.35%
5Y Return (Ann)-2.10%-1.82%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.81%-0.59%
Sharpe Ratio0.690.62
Sortino Ratio1.070.98
Omega Ratio1.121.11
Calmar Ratio0.240.27
Martin Ratio2.181.68
Ulcer Index2.15%2.91%
Daily Std Dev6.84%7.89%
Max Drawdown-28.42%-29.50%
Current Drawdown-16.81%-15.27%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between LEMB and EBND is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LEMB vs. EBND - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LEMB achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's -2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB has underperformed EBND with an annualized return of -0.81%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively higher -0.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.12%
-0.42%
LEMB
EBND

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LEMB vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LEMB and EBND have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for LEMB: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for EBND: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEMB vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LEMB, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LEMB, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LEMB, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LEMB, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LEMB, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.18
EBND
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EBND, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EBND, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EBND, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EBND, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EBND, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.68

LEMB vs. EBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the EBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB and EBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.69
0.62
LEMB
EBND

Dividends

LEMB vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison

LEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than EBND's 5.86% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
1.35%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%6.91%0.00%0.00%0.64%2.85%2.99%
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
5.86%5.27%4.74%3.83%3.67%4.68%4.70%2.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%2.31%

Drawdowns

LEMB vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, roughly equal to the maximum EBND drawdown of -29.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB and EBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-16.81%
-15.27%
LEMB
EBND

Volatility

LEMB vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) is 2.48%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that LEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.48%
3.02%
LEMB
EBND