PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEMB vs. ELD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEMB vs. ELD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMB achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than ELD's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB has underperformed ELD with an annualized return of 1.01%, while ELD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.


LEMB

1D
0.16%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.59%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
1.01%
ALL TIME*
0.52%

ELD

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.07%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
1.54%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.47%
ALL TIME*
1.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$341.81K$470.06K$1.01M
$8.99M$7.31M$6.57M

LEMB vs. ELD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.60%18.02%-1.72%7.23%-10.74%-9.92%3.10%6.40%-7.49%12.49%
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
1.54%21.77%-4.56%14.29%-9.25%-9.75%1.79%12.89%-7.53%12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LEMB and ELD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.74

The correlation between LEMB and ELD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEMB vs. ELD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEMB
LEMB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ELD
ELD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ELD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ELD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEMB vs. ELD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEMBELDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.33

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

4.23

+0.42

LEMB vs. ELD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the ELD Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB and ELD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEMB vs. ELD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, roughly equal to the maximum ELD drawdown of -31.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB and ELD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEMBELDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-31.92%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-7.15%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-9.00%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.89%

-22.06%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

-25.15%

-3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-1.98%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-13.20%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.23%

-0.36%

Volatility

LEMB vs. ELD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) is 1.44%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that LEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEMBELDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.15%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

7.42%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.59%

8.62%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

10.98%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

11.18%

-2.02%

LEMB vs. ELD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ELD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEMB vs. ELD - Dividend Comparison

LEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than ELD's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
5.97%5.38%5.75%4.85%5.29%4.98%4.70%4.92%6.30%4.68%4.86%5.57%
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.38%2.44%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEMB and ELD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELD has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to LEMB (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEMB dropped -30.82% vs ELD's -31.92%.

On 10-year performance, ELD leads with 2.47% vs 1.01% for LEMB. On fees, LEMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ELD has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 1.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ELD.

ELD has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 2.38% for LEMB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB and 0.55% for ELD.

LEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEMB and ELD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer