LEGR vs. IEMG
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.61%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for IEMG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
LEGR vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 22.84% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 25.59%
- 1Y
- 44.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
LEGR vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 11.18% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.65% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 22.84% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and IEMG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between LEGR and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEGR vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR
IEMG
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LEGR
IEMG
Technology
LEGR
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR
IEMG
Communication Services
LEGR
IEMG
Industrials
LEGR
IEMG
Utilities
LEGR
IEMG
Basic Materials
LEGR
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
LEGR
IEMG
Healthcare
LEGR
IEMG
Energy
LEGR
IEMG
Real Estate
LEGR
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
IEMG
LEGR vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEGR | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.23 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 11.89 | -2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -38.71% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -13.21% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -17.21% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -35.75% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -3.98% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -12.95% | +6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.59% | -0.77% |
Volatility
LEGR vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 5.87%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 10.60% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 18.89% | -6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 21.08% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 18.73% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 20.17% | +0.16% |
LEGR vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than IEMG's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.24% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and IEMG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.61% vs 7.15% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.68% for LEGR.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer