PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 22.84% return.


LEGR

1D
0.92%
1M
4.00%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.29%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*

IEMG

1D
0.61%
1M
3.87%
YTD
22.84%
6M
25.59%
1Y
44.83%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.18%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%17.91%18.73%27.99%-14.65%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
22.84%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and IEMG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018

0.81

The correlation between LEGR and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

LEGR vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEGR
IEMG

Financial Services

39.8%
16.7%

Technology

31.8%
42.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.3%
5.6%

Industrials

5.7%
8.0%

Utilities

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

0.8%
3.2%

Energy

0.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Financial Services

LEGR
39.8%
IEMG
16.7%

Technology

LEGR
31.8%
IEMG
42.1%

Consumer Cyclical

LEGR
8.3%
IEMG
8.5%

Communication Services

LEGR
8.3%
IEMG
5.6%

Industrials

LEGR
5.7%
IEMG
8.0%

Utilities

LEGR
1.9%
IEMG
1.9%

Basic Materials

LEGR
1.7%
IEMG
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

LEGR
1.2%
IEMG
2.8%

Healthcare

LEGR
0.8%
IEMG
3.2%

Energy

LEGR
0.7%
IEMG
3.3%

Real Estate

LEGR

-

IEMG
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGRIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.23

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

11.89

-2.17

LEGR vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGRIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-38.71%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-13.21%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-17.21%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-35.75%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-3.98%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-12.95%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.59%

-0.77%

Volatility

LEGR vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 5.87%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGRIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

10.60%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

18.89%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

21.08%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

18.73%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

20.17%

+0.16%

LEGR vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than IEMG's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.24%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.68%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR and IEMG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.61% vs 7.15% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.68% for LEGR.

LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer