LEGR vs. ARKF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both Blockchain funds. LEGR is passively managed, while ARKF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.63%/yr vs -4.02%/yr for ARKF. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.

Performance

LEGR vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -13.21% return.

LEGR

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.72%
• 6M: 5.02%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 11.63%
• 10Y*: —

ARKF

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 2.71%
• 6M: -13.98%
• YTD: -13.21%
• 1Y: -22.52%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: -4.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF	8.65%	30.83%	16.25%	22.79%	-19.01%	17.91%	18.73%	17.41%
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	-13.21%	28.67%	34.34%	93.27%	-65.07%	-17.82%	108.03%	20.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR and ARKF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019	0.68

The correlation between LEGR and ARKF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

LEGR vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LEGR	ARKF
Financial Services	39.8%	25.0%
Technology	31.8%	41.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	12.8%
Communication Services	8.3%	8.9%
Industrials	5.7%	-
Utilities	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	0.2%
Energy	0.7%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

LEGR vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR

LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 51
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ARKF

ARKF Risk / Return Rank: 4
ARKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ARKF Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEGR	ARKF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	-0.67	+2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	-0.79	+2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.91	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	-0.59	+2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	-0.98	+7.93

LEGR vs. ARKF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the ARKF Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR and ARKF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEGR vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and ARKF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEGR	ARKF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-78.63%	+42.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-38.50%	+28.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.25%	-38.50%	+24.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.45%	-75.30%	+43.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.77%	-34.94%	+30.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-34.97%	+28.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	22.93%	-19.87%

Volatility

LEGR vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 3.81%, while ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEGR	ARKF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	8.05%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.42%	25.83%	-13.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	33.70%	-19.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	43.00%	-25.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.28%	39.67%	-19.39%

LEGR vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEGR vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison

LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than ARKF's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF	0.10%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	1.25%	0.00%
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF	1.84%	1.84%	2.40%	2.56%	2.64%	1.80%	0.95%	2.04%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEGR and ARKF in my portfolio?

LEGR and ARKF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEGR or ARKF?

ARKF has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to LEGR (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs ARKF's -78.63%.

Which ETF is better, LEGR or ARKF?

On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.63% vs -4.02% for ARKF. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LEGR or ARKF?

Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.63% return vs -4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LEGR or ARKF?

LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LEGR or ARKF?

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.10% for ARKF.

What is the main difference between LEGR and ARKF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.75% for ARKF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.