LEG vs. VFC
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LEG in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances, VFC in Apparel Manufacturing. Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -12.01%/yr vs -10.23%/yr for VFC. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEG vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed VFC with an annualized return of -12.01%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively higher -10.23% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
VFC
- 1D
- -4.28%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -26.13%
- YTD
- -19.96%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- -7.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.75%
- 10Y*
- -10.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M | |
| $167.52M | $128.15M | $135.42M |
LEG vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -19.96% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and VFC is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.41 |
The correlation between LEG and VFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.34B
VFC:
$5.63B
LEG:
$1.60
VFC:
$0.89
LEG:
6.13
VFC:
16.01
LEG:
0.45
VFC:
0.44
LEG:
$3.03B
VFC:
$9.51B
LEG:
$717.40M
VFC:
$4.28B
LEG:
$433.10M
VFC:
$826.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
VFC
LEG vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.75 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 1.85 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -88.41% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -33.20% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.68% | -63.66% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -86.34% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -88.41% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.20% | -82.46% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -21.85% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 13.49% | +0.23% |
Volatility
LEG vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is 11.32%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that LEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 22.75% | -11.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 36.49% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.36% | 51.32% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 54.30% | -11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.96% | 45.42% | -5.46% |
Dividends
LEG vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than VFC's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.51% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
LEG vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and VFC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to LEG (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs VFC's -88.41%.
VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer