LEG vs. PG
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -11.28%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEG vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -11.28%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.47%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
PG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- -3.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
LEG vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 0.42% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 4.11% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and PG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.49B
PG:
$342.40B
LEG:
$1.60
PG:
$5.24
LEG:
6.85
PG:
28.05
LEG:
0.51
PG:
4.11
LEG:
1.48
PG:
6.58
LEG:
$3.03B
PG:
$86.72B
LEG:
$717.40M
PG:
$43.64B
LEG:
$433.10M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
PG
LEG vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | -0.29 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | -0.52 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -54.25% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -15.52% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.78% | -21.15% | -55.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -23.77% | -60.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -23.77% | -62.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.78% | -14.78% | -62.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.76% | -12.16% | -7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 8.73% | +5.39% |
Volatility
LEG vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.83%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | 6.83% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.85% | 15.83% | +16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.11% | 19.55% | +29.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 18.02% | +24.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.87% | 19.13% | +20.74% |
Dividends
LEG vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PG's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.83% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.90% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
LEG vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and PG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to PG (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs PG's -54.25%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer