LEG vs. PG
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -12.01%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PG. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEG vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -12.01%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M | |
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B |
LEG vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and PG is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.34B
PG:
$336.46B
LEG:
$1.60
PG:
$6.62
LEG:
6.13
PG:
21.84
LEG:
0.45
PG:
4.03
LEG:
1.33
PG:
6.44
LEG:
$3.03B
PG:
$87.03B
LEG:
$717.40M
PG:
$43.67B
LEG:
$433.10M
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
PG
LEG vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.01 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.07 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | -0.13 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -54.25% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -15.52% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.68% | -21.15% | -55.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -23.77% | -60.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -23.77% | -62.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.20% | -15.63% | -63.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -12.17% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 9.06% | +4.66% |
Volatility
LEG vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.95%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 6.95% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 15.72% | +16.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.36% | 19.64% | +29.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 18.08% | +24.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.96% | 19.18% | +20.78% |
Dividends
LEG vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PG's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
LEG vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and PG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to PG (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs PG's -54.25%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer