LEG vs. PG
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -11.64%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for PG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEG vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -11.64%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.50%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- -29.34%
- 5Y*
- -25.68%
- 10Y*
- -11.64%
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
LEG vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -8.64% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and PG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.41B
PG:
$350.63B
LEG:
$1.60
PG:
$5.23
LEG:
6.25
PG:
27.76
LEG:
0.46
PG:
4.07
LEG:
1.36
PG:
6.50
LEG:
$3.03B
PG:
$86.72B
LEG:
$717.40M
PG:
$43.64B
LEG:
$433.10M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
PG
LEG vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.94 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.58 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | -1.04 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | -0.48 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.61 | 0.23 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.29 | 0.46 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.46 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
LEG vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -54.25% | -32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -15.52% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.39% | -21.15% | -56.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.42% | -23.77% | -61.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -23.77% | -62.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.87% | -15.91% | -62.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -12.16% | -7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.58% | 8.93% | +4.65% |
Volatility
LEG vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.01%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 7.01% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.79% | 15.32% | +15.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.55% | 18.65% | +30.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.40% | 17.79% | +24.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 19.05% | +20.72% |
Dividends
LEG vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than PG's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.00% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
LEG vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and PG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs PG's -54.25%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer