PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LEAD vs. GQGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

LEAD vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

LEAD and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LEAD is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2016. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

LEAD vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LEAD vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF		1.87%5.59%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		8.19%-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 8.19% return.

LEAD

1D
1.09%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.47%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
13.26%

GQGU

1D
-1.30%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
8.19%
6M
6.64%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

GQG US Equity ETF

Often compared with LEAD:
LEAD vs. SPYLEAD vs. VIGLEAD vs. SCHDLEAD vs. DSTLLEAD vs. DGROLEAD vs. VOOLEAD vs. VYM
Often compared with GQGU:
GQGU vs. SCHGGQGU vs. QQQMGQGU vs. VUGGQGU vs. ACWIGQGU vs. BBUSGQGU vs. TOPTGQGU vs. BAMG

LEAD vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

LEAD vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LEAD
LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
GQGU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LEADGQGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.36

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEAD vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LEADGQGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.02

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and GQGU is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

LEAD vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than GQGU's 0.94% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF		0.66%0.70%0.93%1.13%1.27%1.79%0.81%1.32%1.38%0.97%1.38%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF		0.94%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and GQGU.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LEADGQGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-6.65%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.19%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-3.24%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-2.21%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

—

—

Volatility

LEAD vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LEADGQGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

9.66%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

9.66%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

9.66%

+8.94%