LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LDUK.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF) and GLGG.L (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while GLGG.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDUK.L returned 9.34%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for GLGG.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDUK.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GLGG.L.

Performance

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDUK.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than GLGG.L's 2.12% return.

LDUK.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: —

GLGG.L

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 9.96%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 6.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF	3.01%	22.62%	16.13%	8.22%	-3.33%	6.07%
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.12%	7.81%	5.74%	14.58%	-7.49%	14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LDUK.L and GLGG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.51

The correlation between LDUK.L and GLGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LDUK.L	GLGG.L
Financial Services	60.4%	-
Industrials	14.3%	65.2%
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	1.7%
Basic Materials	6.8%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	-
Communication Services	1.1%	-
Utilities	1.0%	15.8%
Technology	0.1%	6.4%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDUK.L

LDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GLGG.L

GLGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
GLGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GLGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDUK.L	GLGG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.72	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.07	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.13	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.85	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	2.15	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDUK.L and GLGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDUK.L	GLGG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.72	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.44	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.58	+0.17

Drawdowns

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum GLGG.L drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUK.L and GLGG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDUK.L	GLGG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.13%	-27.08%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.51%	-11.62%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.46%	-16.35%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.13%	-18.82%	+1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-8.46%	+6.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-5.14%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	4.63%	-1.48%

Volatility

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) at 4.33%. This indicates that LDUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDUK.L	GLGG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	4.33%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	11.10%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.67%	13.76%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	15.04%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	17.68%	-2.04%

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDUK.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLGG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDUK.L vs. GLGG.L - Dividend Comparison

LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF	4.79%	4.87%	4.43%	5.14%	5.87%	4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDUK.L and GLGG.L in my portfolio?

LDUK.L and GLGG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDUK.L or GLGG.L?

On fees, LDUK.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDUK.L or GLGG.L?

LDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GLGG.L.

What is the main difference between LDUK.L and GLGG.L?

LDUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GLGG.L is Water Equities. LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while GLGG.L tracks S&P Global Water TR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDUK.L and 0.49% for GLGG.L.