PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. LNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDSF vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 13.71% return.


LDSF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
6M
0.68%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*

LNGX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-3.78%
6M
16.89%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDSF vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and LNGX is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LNGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDSFLNGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

LDSF vs. LNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, smaller than the maximum LNGX drawdown of -17.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and LNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFLNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-17.89%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-16.33%

+16.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-5.93%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

Volatility

LDSF vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDSFLNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

24.88%

-22.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.09%

24.88%

-21.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.17%

24.88%

-21.71%

LDSF vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDSF vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than LNGX's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.65%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%
LNGX
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF
0.87%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDSF and LNGX have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.

LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.87% for LNGX.

LDSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.45% for LNGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDSF and LNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer