LDSF vs. LNGX
LDSF (First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDSF is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. LDSF is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. LDSF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
LDSF vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 13.71% return.
LDSF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDSF vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 0.95% | 0.60% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 13.71% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDSF and LNGX is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDSF vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
LDSF
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDSF vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDSF | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDSF vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, smaller than the maximum LNGX drawdown of -17.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDSF | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -17.89% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -16.33% | +16.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -5.93% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility
LDSF vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDSF | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 24.88% | -22.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 24.88% | -21.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 24.88% | -21.71% |
LDSF vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDSF vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than LNGX's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 4.65% | 4.52% | 4.53% | 4.08% | 2.61% | 1.97% | 2.65% | 3.06% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.87% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDSF and LNGX have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.
LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.87% for LNGX.
LDSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for LDSF and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer