PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRT vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRT vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.78% return.


LDRT

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.65%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.89%

VTG

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
1.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.94M$4.70M$2.36M
$2.81M$3.14M$2.90M

LDRT vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and VTG is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.68

The correlation between LDRT and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRT vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDRT
LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDRT vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRTVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

0.68

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.38

1.62

+5.76

LDRT vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum VTG drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRTVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-2.89%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-2.89%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-2.55%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.90%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

1.22%

-0.78%

Volatility

LDRT vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) at 0.88%. This indicates that LDRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRTVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.88%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

2.68%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90%

3.49%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

3.51%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

3.51%

-0.72%

LDRT vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRT vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than VTG's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
4.07%3.86%0.69%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.31%1.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRT and VTG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDRT has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to VTG (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, LDRT leads with 2.63% vs 1.06% for VTG. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRT has performed better with a 2.63% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for LDRT.

LDRT has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.31% for VTG.

LDRT tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index, while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.03% for VTG.

LDRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRT and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer