PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRT vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRT vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.


LDRT

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.91%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.45%
6M
-2.30%
YTD
-1.59%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRT vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and TLTX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRT vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT
LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRT vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRTTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.59

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

1.32

+7.21

LDRT vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRTTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-6.35%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-6.35%

+5.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-5.23%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-2.38%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

2.83%

-2.40%

Volatility

LDRT vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) is 0.96%, while Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that LDRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRTTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.87%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

6.92%

-5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

9.24%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

9.24%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.80%

9.24%

-6.44%

LDRT vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDRT vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than TLTX's 17.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
4.06%3.86%0.69%
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
17.73%7.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRT and TLTX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to LDRT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs TLTX's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, TLTX leads with 3.72% vs 3.67% for LDRT. On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, LDRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTX has performed better with a 3.72% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 4.06% for LDRT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.29% for TLTX.

LDRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRT and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer