PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRT vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRT vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 6.30% return.


LDRT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDW

1D
-4.59%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
6.30%
6M
4.41%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRT vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and NVDW is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRT vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT
LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRT vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRTNVDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.61

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

3.72

+3.99

LDRT vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the NVDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and NVDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRTNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-25.54%

+24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-25.54%

+24.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-18.09%

+17.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-8.50%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

11.01%

-10.58%

Volatility

LDRT vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) is 0.79%, while Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.16%. This indicates that LDRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRTNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

15.16%

-14.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

32.09%

-30.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

42.50%

-39.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

42.02%

-39.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.76%

42.02%

-39.26%

LDRT vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDRT vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than NVDW's 63.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
4.09%3.86%0.69%
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
63.83%38.94%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRT and NVDW have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDW has higher volatility (15.16%) compared to LDRT (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs NVDW's -25.54%.

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 40.81% vs 3.31% for LDRT. On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, LDRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 40.81% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 63.83%, compared with 4.09% for LDRT.

LDRT is categorized as Government Bonds, while NVDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.99% for NVDW.

LDRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRT and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer