LDRI vs. TSCV
LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDRI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index, while TSCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent. LDRI is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. LDRI charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.
Performance
LDRI vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 15.89% return.
LDRI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCV
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRI vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 1.92% | 0.46% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDRI and TSCV is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDRI vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank
LDRI
TSCV
LDRI vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDRI | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDRI | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.26 | 2.84 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
LDRI vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum TSCV drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and TSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDRI | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -10.17% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.70% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -2.11% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | — | — |
Volatility
LDRI vs. TSCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDRI | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 16.80% | -14.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 16.80% | -14.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 16.80% | -14.52% |
LDRI vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDRI vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison
LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than TSCV's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 3.52% | 4.23% | 0.83% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDRI and TSCV have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
LDRI has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.
LDRI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while TSCV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRI and 0.60% for TSCV.
Find the right allocation for LDRI and TSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer