LDMIX vs. LZUSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDMIX (Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio) and LZUSX (Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LDMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Lazard, while LZUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX returned 10.51%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for LZUSX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDMIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LZUSX.

Performance

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDMIX achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than LZUSX's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX has underperformed LZUSX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while LZUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.

LDMIX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 13.68%
• YTD: 35.63%
• 6M: 39.16%
• 1Y: 68.95%
• 3Y*: 26.47%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

LZUSX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	35.63%	33.67%	6.73%	9.68%	-22.61%	-10.14%	19.33%	28.17%	-20.57%	41.15%
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	5.70%	15.23%	14.20%	19.79%	-16.97%	27.40%	17.28%	31.71%	-3.36%	18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LDMIX and LZUSX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008	0.67

The correlation between LDMIX and LZUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LDMIX vs. LZUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDMIX

LDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
LDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LZUSX

LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 41
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDMIX	LZUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.90	1.97	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	2.73	+2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.34	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.29	2.17	+3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.00	8.84	+11.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the LZUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDMIX and LZUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDMIX	LZUSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90	1.97	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.55	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.73	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.49	-0.18

Drawdowns

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDMIX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, smaller than the maximum LZUSX drawdown of -55.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDMIX and LZUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDMIX	LZUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.12%	-55.40%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-10.07%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-19.18%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.66%	-23.05%	-19.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	-35.12%	-11.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.51%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.75%	-7.85%	-11.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	2.47%	+1.00%

Volatility

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) at 2.13%. This indicates that LDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDMIX	LZUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	2.13%	+5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.97%	8.26%	+6.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	11.14%	+6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.12%	16.42%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.30%	17.69%	+1.61%

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDMIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LZUSX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDMIX vs. LZUSX - Dividend Comparison

LDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than LZUSX's 13.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	0.86%	1.17%	0.84%	2.24%	0.83%	1.00%	0.25%	0.54%	0.78%	0.20%	0.95%	0.56%
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio	13.07%	13.81%	6.61%	1.09%	2.77%	5.78%	5.28%	11.94%	17.57%	10.34%	3.41%	7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDMIX and LZUSX in my portfolio?

LDMIX and LZUSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDMIX or LZUSX?

LDMIX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to LZUSX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDMIX dropped -51.12% vs LZUSX's -55.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.