PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDLVX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDLVX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDLVX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LDLVX has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 2.45%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


LDLVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.45%

VEA

1D
0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.19%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDLVX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
0.82%6.28%4.94%5.75%-5.31%1.21%3.22%5.71%1.54%1.58%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.19%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LDLVX and VEA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.11

The correlation between LDLVX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDLVX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDLVX
LDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDLVX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDLVXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.37

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.77

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

10.82

+4.08

LDLVX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDLVX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDLVXVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.06

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.59

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.59

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.25

+0.57

Drawdowns

LDLVX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDLVX drawdown since its inception was -9.67%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDLVX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDLVXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-60.68%

+51.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-11.63%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-13.45%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.35%

-29.71%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-35.73%

+26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.66%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-13.29%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

2.98%

-2.68%

Volatility

LDLVX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) is 0.83%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that LDLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDLVXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

5.49%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

13.32%

-11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

15.64%

-13.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

16.54%

-13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.63%

17.35%

-14.72%

LDLVX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDLVX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDLVX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

LDLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than VEA's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
5.25%5.29%4.81%4.76%2.64%2.66%3.11%3.86%4.18%2.99%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.61%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDLVX and VEA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to LDLVX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDLVX dropped -9.67% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDLVX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer