LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and GGRA.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Global Equity Income funds - LDGL.L tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index while GGRA.L tracks the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDGL.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRA.L.

Performance

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LDGL.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GGRA.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 16.41%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	8.09%
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LDGL.L and GGRA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRA.L

GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDGL.L	GGRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.78	+0.74

Drawdowns

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDGL.L drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum GGRA.L drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGL.L and GGRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDGL.L	GGRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	-30.94%	+21.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-0.16%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-4.29%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LDGL.L	GGRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	12.29%	+2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	14.66%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.97%	14.91%	+0.06%

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDGL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRA.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDGL.L vs. GGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc	0.00%
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDGL.L and GGRA.L in my portfolio?

LDGL.L and GGRA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDGL.L or GGRA.L?

On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDGL.L or GGRA.L?

LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRA.L.

What is the main difference between LDGL.L and GGRA.L?

LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. They also come from different issuers: L&G and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LDGL.L and 0.38% for GGRA.L.